Free Screening
Gap Analysis

Standard EHR tools only read discrete fields. Regard reads the whole record to find eligible patients buried in echoes, notes, and reports.

Under 4 hours of IT
Under a standard BAA
Results in under 2 weeks

Find eligible patients your screening missed

Data handled under a standard Business Associate Agreement. We'll reach out within onebusiness day to confirm eligibility and scope the analysis.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

How it works

Three steps, results in two weeks, minimal IT lift

01

Scope a sample

We align together on the slice of your census to analyze. A standard BAA clears data access before anything moves, and our team handles the paperwork.

Scoped sample
Standard BAA
02

Extract the data

One historical extract covers it: labs, vitals, notes, and the echoes where qualifying values hide. Under four hours of your IT team's time.

Labs
Vitals
Notes
Echoes
03

Review the findings

Findings land in under two weeks. Together we go through the count, the dollar math, and the source evidence behind every flagged patient.

Case counts
Dollar quantification
Live walkthrough

What you'll get

Your missed cases, counted and quantified

You get a count of patients in your data who were eligible for a procedure, consult, or intervention that never happened, plus what those cases are worth. Every finding cites its source: the echo, note, lab, or weight trend behind it.

Missed cases counted, broken out by condition
Dollar value finance and clinical leadership can agree on

Illustrative output. The figures shown are examples; your report reflects your own data.

Use cases

Two ways systems run the analysis.

Pick the track that fits your team, or run both.

Service lines

Cardiology

Quantifies what missed follow-up costs cardiology and other high-value service lines in lost procedure volume.

Cardiology
Severe aortic stenosis: criteria applied to aortic valve area, mean gradient, and documented symptoms, including values that only appear in free-text echo reports, to return the TAVR candidates nobody referred
Atrial fibrillation: returns the patients who met criteria for catheter ablation or Watchman
Inpatient quality measures

Malnutrition

Counts the acuity you treated but never documented: patients across the census whose record supported a malnutrition diagnosis that was never made.

Malnutrition
Reads the full record, including weight trends, intake, muscle-wasting language, and labs, and identifies likely malnutrition even where nursing screening was left incomplete
Shows which patients needed a dietitian consult that never got ordered before discharge
Totals the CC/MCC documentation that went uncaptured, with the encounters attached so finance can verify it

Impact

What closing these gaps is worth.

+40%
in denials prevented
Malnutrition capture
+10%
in denials prevented
TAVR volume
~$11K
in denials prevented
DRG lift per malnutrition case

Every one of these numbers is a diagnosis problem: a qualifying value in a free-text echo, a weight trend no screening tool read.
Regard has recommended millions of diagnoses that would have otherwise been missed, across more than 150 hospitals nationwide.

What is Regard?

Diagnostic intelligence across the health system

Regard's diagnostic intelligence platform reads the full record on every patient to catch what gets missed. Scout is its population-level layer: it finds patients already eligible for a high-value procedure, consult, or intervention who have not been acted on. Health systems use it to close care gaps, grow procedural volume, prevent revenue leakage, and reduce readmissions.

FAQ

Frequently asked
questions

The questions service-line and quality leaders ask before running it.

Still have questions?
Our team is happy to walk you through it.
What does the analysis require?

One historical data extract, defined jointly before work begins. Most IT teams complete it in under four hours. A standard Business Associate Agreement is executed before any data moves, and the extract is limited to a patient sample your organization approves. The analysis runs under the same security controls as Regard's live EHR deployments and is available for Epic and Oracle Health (Cerner) systems.

How is this different from existing EHR screening tools?

Keyword filters and standard EHR tools work from discrete fields, so evidence buried in unstructured echoes, notes, and reports never surfaces. The analysis runs the same engine as Scout: it reads the whole record, including unstructured text, across every patient in the sample. It's the same approach behind Scout's prioritized, evidence-backed worklist in live deployments.

Why is the analysis free?

The analysis is how we demonstrate Scout's value: it shows, on your own data, what current screening is not capturing. There is no fee and no purchase commitment. If the findings are material, we'll propose a working session on how Scout addresses the same gaps prospectively; whether to continue is your decision.